While your points are alright, don't open with big bang quotes. 'govt has no business..' why do you need to say this in an answer for an exam where you are aspiring to be in the govt? Always prefer the middle path, no fancy stuff.
It's a pretty straight forward q. So points will be quite similar. As such, it's a short note. So marks may go down if any of the key points are missed out.. but such as may not necessarily be asked in the exam in such a straight forward/plain vanilla format. My idea was for you all to make your notes and focus on structuring your replies.
Read some of the answers here. The content and structure is something that can be improved upon. Your's is a good answer but ofcourse there is always room to improve
This is a fact oriented question. So unless there is something glaringly odd, most answers will be on a similar keel. As you work on different kinds of questions, you get better. Rest assured, if we find any lacunae, it will be conveyed candidly.
Overall structure is decent. The second page on challenges, looks a little haphazard and somewhat rushed. Same points can be better presented.
The reference to the Eco Survey is good.
Thank you sir for your time and review. I did not want to exceed more than two pages so ended up with this messy representation.will work on it
While your points are alright, don't open with big bang quotes. 'govt has no business..' why do you need to say this in an answer for an exam where you are aspiring to be in the govt? Always prefer the middle path, no fancy stuff.
Other than this, rest is good 👍
The statement was stated in pib and given by petroleum minister himself so I thought of quoting that.
First para, define what the question is asking. Content is fine, focus on the structure.
Ok Sir! Is their any more points which could have been added Sir? Cause I am seeing everyone has almost the same points
It's a pretty straight forward q. So points will be quite similar. As such, it's a short note. So marks may go down if any of the key points are missed out.. but such as may not necessarily be asked in the exam in such a straight forward/plain vanilla format. My idea was for you all to make your notes and focus on structuring your replies.
Good going
Define the issue about which the q is asked first and foremost. Decent attempt.
Sir ,any improvements??
Read some of the answers here. The content and structure is something that can be improved upon. Your's is a good answer but ofcourse there is always room to improve
Good
Well attempted. Keep practicing.
Sir, could you please also mention the lacunae in my answer so that I will try to avoid those mistakes next time ?
This is a fact oriented question. So unless there is something glaringly odd, most answers will be on a similar keel. As you work on different kinds of questions, you get better. Rest assured, if we find any lacunae, it will be conveyed candidly.
Although you could slightly add content, I think your answer is very exam oriented and pointed. Very good 👌
Thank you so much sir. I will definitely work on the lacunae..
Slightly more content could be added... Structure is good .
Content is fine. You need not name the Minister or personality associated with the launch. Redundant. Structure of answer is decent...
Refer my earlier comments..
Overall good attempt.
Good